Jeez Louise. There comes a time when vanity becomes ridiculous. Charo was almost a little bit hot in the 60's, but, she's like 700 years old now and still dressed like a ho and cootchie cooing. Loni Anderson's got the skin of her face stetched tighter than a snare drum and forgot her wobbles and flaps from the neck down. Usually I'm all for doing what makes you happy, but, they just look embarassing. Is this what Britney will be like if she lives this long? I'm going the Diane Keaton route, she may be weird, but, at least the woman knows the value of a turtle neck and sleeves.
6 comments:
Man!!! What a waste of money, the face is passable but from the neck down? You can't hide age! Be like Helen Mirren, she's the only oldy role model we've got right now. Aggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!
I can not for the life of me understand why women are afraid to look their age....if you are in your sixties, better to "look good for your age" naturally than to look like loni anderson....she looks awfull, neck up, neck down...it just doesn't matter...and what is with charo's eyes, whomever did her makeup should rethink their career path...creepy
I know who Loni is, and yes its time to stop the visits to the plastic surgeon, but wtf is the other one, she looks like a bad version of a blowup doll.
I'm gonna go for Katherine Hepburn...that way I can retain my bitchiness and loud mouth in my old age.
You would think with time running out for these women, they would have better things to do with their time, rather than spending hours a day on their appearance.
BBABH
Charo was the no talent "it" girl for a short period of time when TV was invented.
I forgot about the beautiful Helen Mirren. She's got it goin' on. These two make Joan Rivers look natural.
Anyone who says it is better to look your age obviously hasn't started aging.
Loni looks great. I've never understood what it is about Charo that others liked, but she is who she is.
-ca
Post a Comment