I put an Ashley pic on here the other day and it was actually MK (in the gold dress)..my readers are sharp as tacks and alerted me to my goof. If I'd seen them side by side, I would have known, even without gawking for the Hermes' vs the Chanel and emerald ring, etc. Ash has a tendency to brush her hair once in awhile. My reputation is now tarnished beyond repair. Sob.*
The article didn't say, but, I'm sure that's Christian Louboutin with them. We have so much to thank him for. Broken dreams of red soled shoes we will never own. Shoe envy. It hurts, doesn't it?
7 comments:
how the hell can you tell them apart? seriously, how??
the one on the right looks like a wreck.
How do you tell them apart?
Mary Kate is the homeless drug addicted junkie looking one. Ashley is more put together, the cleaner of them both. so Mary Kate = dirty Ashley = cleaner
MK is a tiny bit shorter and their faces are just a bit different.
loubitin shoes aren't all that the only diffrence is the red sole.
Ohhhh. thanks guys.
so then, the one on the right must be Mary Kate.
:)
Ashley has a bit of a figure too and a fuller face. She's the pretty one of the 2. I think she actually cares about her appearance. & the CL shoes are very cool & no, I won't ever own a pair either. But I don't care. He was very smart to do the red sole thing tho, wasn't he? Who woulda thot of that? Smart marketing. They are always unmistakeble in pics. Maybe PayLess can do a pink soled heel for Breast Cancer awareness sometime. Then alot more people will be able to support a shoe with a purpose!
Duh I still can't tell em apart but gold dress looks like a CHEAP hooker, seriously. I'm telling Uncle Jessie.
Post a Comment