data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ab01/5ab013de70bce647e654f8f18dee3473438198d4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ac4f/2ac4fa9d4efae50e360804962bd09e6424272b6d" alt=""
Kate Hudson in this Septembers issue of W compared with Nadja Auermann '94 Bazaar just proved some body's actually looking at this crap to even notice the unoriginal poop. It looks nothing like Kate Hudson anyhow, they fail to realize any appeal she has is based on her being the cute girl next door type. W's take on her looks more like Kate Moss, adding to the confusion. Oh, I just realized W put "and you thought she was the girl next door" in the title. No, I really didn't, I just thought you had a photo shop addict working on your staff. Heavy on the softening tool much? If I had a retarded cover award, they'd get it.
3 comments:
i LIKE the W cover better than the cover they copied...Kate looks good here...good photoshopping!
It was 15 years ago thats not exactly ripping off a current competing magazine cover. Similar cover shots are done all the time and alot more frequent then 15 years apart.
A comment about similarities, hate it or love it etc is one thing, calling it a rip off is just stretching & searching.
I like the W cover better then the other one too tia.
And Halloween is still more than two months away.
Post a Comment