71 year old photographer, David Bailey has decided he doesn't want to be a knight or whatever the Queen appoints you when you're about to kick off and have been of some great service. He seems determined to piss the royal family off. David says: "I mean she (Diana) was a nice girl, she came to my studio a few times and she was a pleasant enough woman, but a great beauty she wasn't," says the 71-year-old snapper.
He adds this jab: "I remember when they used to use the word 'handsome' to describe Prince Charles, but God you got a stretched imagination – he looks like a banjo player in Appalachia. There goes my knighthood."
He adds this jab: "I remember when they used to use the word 'handsome' to describe Prince Charles, but God you got a stretched imagination – he looks like a banjo player in Appalachia. There goes my knighthood."
*
Whatever, dude. I don't see how anyone can say Diana and Prince Charles weren't good looking. They'll go down in history looking a whole lot better than most of the old royal portraits. In fact, it's my opinion, that the whole royal family is pretty blessed genetically. And there must be a good looking banjo player somewhere in Appalachia who's right pissed about now. No Mountain Dew for you, David Bailey.
Whatever, dude. I don't see how anyone can say Diana and Prince Charles weren't good looking. They'll go down in history looking a whole lot better than most of the old royal portraits. In fact, it's my opinion, that the whole royal family is pretty blessed genetically. And there must be a good looking banjo player somewhere in Appalachia who's right pissed about now. No Mountain Dew for you, David Bailey.
10 comments:
So...did he say who he thought WAS a great beauty?
I have seen Daina pics in which she looks very attractive and sexy; but would not go so far as to say she was beautiful.
Charles in not good looking. He is a dud and boring as anyone could imagine. Good thing Harry is not is son, obviously Capt. Hewitt made some appearances and stayed for breakfast after a jolly good rogering. By all accounts Harry acts just like him, and looks like a stamped image of the fun-loving paramour.
It's a matter of taste. I always thought Charles was very good looking. I like it that he talks to his plants.
My uncle Ted has a still in the shed
And he brews a gallon or two....
Birds in the sky
Get so drunk
They can't fly
With the smell of that
Good ole mountain dewwwwwww!
That song used to crack me up.
Daphne
I think Diana was a very attractive lady..I never once seen a photo of Charles and thought he was good looking. The ears for one thing..he's not my idea of what a Prince Charming should look like.
Eliza
David Bailey was married to Catherine Deneuve so his taste in beauty is probably distorted. If Deneuve is considered beautiful, which I think she is, then Diana looks like a boy. There was always something masculine about her. Shapeless body and boyish haircut. Charles looks like the inbred cousin of howdy Doody.
Diana bred some lovely height into the midget royal family and so her sons are super.
But take the faces of diana and Charles without tiaras or hats or fancy dress and put them on any other body -- not so pretty. I loved Diana, but i never thought she was stereotypically beautiful.
Actually, Harry looks just like Diana's side of the family. Look at her brother. Harry looks a lot like him.
ha ha ha!!!!! "inbred cousin of Howdy Doody" rotfl!!! thanks so much for that, that was awesome!!!!!!
I have not heard anyone that thought Charles was good looking. That is just not the word that comes to mind when you look at him. Sorry. To each their own but you are probably in a vast minority on the royal family and their looks! LOL
There have been times that I thought Charles was handsome, and I definitely thought Diana was beautiful. It's definitely in the eye of the beholder, though. There are people who think that Angelina Jolie is beautiful, and I've always thought she was fug.
Post a Comment